Evaluation

=What will I turn in and present?=
 * Individually- A hard copy of your answered questions **INCLUDING 2 CREDIBLE, SCIENTIFIC SOURCES**
 * Individually An oral presentation of the answers to your question
 * Individually- a peer review for EACH of your group members (to be completed after presentation)- Due class after presentation
 * As a group, you will use at least 2 visual aids in your presentation
 * As a group, you will present your popular pathogen product (skit, PSA, bill, etc)

=ALL IS DUE THE __DAY OF__ THE PRESENTATION EXCEPT PEER REVIEWS=

DEADLY DILEMMA PROJECT RUBRIC
 * || ** 0 **  ||  ** 1 **  ||  ** 2 **  ||  ** 3 **  ||  ** 4 **  ||  ** 5 **  ||
 * ** Individual Questions ** || Questions were not given in hard copy form || An attempt was made to answer the questions, but they were all incorrect || Three questions were answered incorrectly on either the paper or presentation || Two questions were answered incorrectly on either the paper or presentation || One question was answered incorrectly on either the paper or presentation || All three questions answered accurately and scientifically in the presentation and paper ||
 * ** Individual Presentation ** || Individual did not speak in front of the class || Individual made an attempt to speak in front of the class but spoke incoherently || Individual spoke with all 3 components being inappropriate (clarity, volume, length) || Individual spoke with 2 of the 3 components being inappropriate (clarity, volume, length) || Individual spoke with one of the 3 components being inappropriate (clarity, volume, length) || Individual spoke with appropriate volume, clarity and length of presentation ||
 * ** Individual Sources ** || Individual strictly uses opinion || No sources were cited || Only one source was given, but it was neither credible nor scientific || At least 2 sources were given in paper but neither were credible or scientific || At least 2 sources were given in paper but one was not credible or scientific || At least 2 credible, scientific sources were cited in paper ||
 * ** Peer Review Score ** || Peer review average below 1.5 || Peer review average of 1.5-1.9 || Peer review average of 2-2.7 || Peer review average of 3-3.7 || Peer review average of 4-4.7 || Peer review average of 4.8-5 ||
 * ** Group Presentation ** || All group members were unengaged. Quality of presentation was very poor || Three group members were unengaged and contributed little to the presentation || Two group members were unengaged and contributed little to the presentation || One group member was unengaged and contributed little to the presentation || Group members seemed to work together and contribute, but spoke unequally || All group members worked together, spoke equally, and contributed to the presentation ||
 * ** Group Aesthetics ** || Group neither used visual aids nor presented a PPP || Group did not use any visual aids, but they DID present their PPP || Group used only one visual aid, but it did not support the presentation well, but they presented their PPP || Group used only one visual aid that supported the presentation well AND presented their PPP || Group used at least 2 visual aids but only one supported the presentation well AND presented their PPP || Group used at least 2 visual aids that supported the presentation well AND presented their “popular pathogen product” (PPP) ||
 * ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   || =Total  __/30__= ||


 * BACK TO HOME**